US Dept. of Education is redefining the digit

Earlier this month, the US Department of Education (ED) made a call to action and broadened the definition of the digital divide by releasing its first National Educational Technology Plan (NETP) since 2016.
The simplest definition of the digital divide is that there are haves and have-nots when it comes to technology. That can be anything from lacking access to high-speed internet in a rural county to not being able to afford to pay for Wi-Fi or buy devices.
As tech literacy becomes a mandatory part of joining the workforce, it largely falls to schools to address the digital divide — and to help close it.
Read the full 2024 NETP
One-to-one student computing gained traction in 2015, with 45% of public schools committing to assigning school-budget-friendly Chromebooks or laptops to students in elementary through high school. That was a big step toward potentially closing the gap.
But when the COVID-19 lockdowns made virtual schooling necessary, a huge gash of inequity was exposed. Some kids had school-issued Chromebooks and no access to wifi. Others had no device at home, despite the one-to-one initiative.
Why aren’t schools more effectively closing the digital divide? In the 2024 National Education Action Plan, the ED pinpoints issues and proposes solutions within an expanded digital equity framework.
It’s a detailed 113-page document that anyone interested in education, technology and the digital divide should read in full. Here, we break down some of the main takeaways.
The 2016 NETP had a focus on the digital divide and ways to address it. The 2024 edition goes even deeper by dividing the divide into three distinct types that need to be addressed individually:
Closing these divides requires funding, resources and training. That’s a lot to implement.
But, if legislation like the recently introduced federal AI Literacy Act gets passed, schools may see more funding for digital literacy.
Some things the NETP asks state lawmakers to do now include:
The NETP includes dozens of examples of effective edtech implementation from all over the country, proving that, while challenging, it can be done. Here’s an excerpt from an appendix that details how Virginia collected data about students’ broadband access at home across the state:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Virginia needed a complete picture of student home access to devices and broadband. The state couldn’t apply resources to address the problem without an accurate understanding of student access. In 2022, Virginia passed legislation requiring every school district to submit an annual report to the Virginia Department of Education and the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development listing the 911 address of all students who do not have home broadband access, defined by speeds at or above 100 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 20 Mbps upload.

Data collection processes can be challenging to establish, and school districts had to devise methods of collecting accurate information from families. In addition, the data includes PII such as student addresses and must be secured. Data collection is more efficient now that systems have been established to gather and protect it. Student information systems must include standardized fields to store the data without requiring districts to make costly custom requests.

By systematically collecting device and access metrics across Virginia, the state has a comprehensive data set for broadband planning. At the local level, districts can understand better how to serve their students and families.
Subscribe for free today and stay up to date with news and tips you need to grow your career and connect with our vibrant tech community.

source US Dept. oindia US Dept. ochina US Dept. ousa US Dept. o
Canada US Dept. okuwait US Dept. oAntigua and Barbuda
US Dept. oArgentina US Dept. oArmenia
US Dept. o
Australia
US Dept. oAustria
US Dept. oAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
US Dept. oBaden*
Bahamas, The
US Dept. oBahrain
US Dept. oBangladesh
US Dept. oBarbados
US Dept. oBavaria*
US Dept. oBelarus
US Dept. oBelgium
US Dept. oBelize
US Dept. oBenin (Dahomey)
US Dept. oBolivia
US Dept. oBosnia and Herzegovina
US Dept. oBotswana
US Dept. oBrazil
US Dept. oBrunei
US Dept. oBrunswick and Lüneburg*
US Dept. oBulgaria
US Dept. oBurkina Faso
US Dept. oBurma
US Dept. oBurundi
US Dept. oCabo Verde
US Dept. oCambodia
US Dept. oCameroon
US Dept. oCanada
US Dept. oCayman Islands, The
US Dept. oCentral African Republic
US Dept. oCentral American Federation*
US Dept. oChad
US Dept. oChile
US Dept. oChina
China
US Dept. oColombia
US Dept. oComoros
US Dept. oCongo Free State, The*
US Dept. oCosta Rica
US Dept. oCote d’Ivoire
US Dept. oCroatia
US Dept. oCuba
US Dept. oCyprus
US Dept. oCzechia
US Dept. oCzechoslovakia*
US Dept. oDemocratic Republic of the Congo
US Dept. oDenmark
US Dept. oDjibouti
US Dept. oDominica
US Dept. oDominican Republic
US Dept. oDuchy of Parma, The*
US Dept. oEast Germany German Democratic Republic*
US Dept. oEcuador
US Dept. oEgypt
US Dept. oEl Salvador
US Dept. oEquatorial Guinea
US Dept. oEritrea
US Dept. oEstonia
US Dept. oEswatini
US Dept. oEthiopia
US Dept. oFederal Government of Germany *
US Dept. oFiji
US Dept. oFinland
US Dept. oindia US Dept. ochina US Dept. ousa US Dept. o
Canada US Dept. okuwait US Dept. oAntigua and Barbuda
US Dept. oArgentina US Dept. oArmenia
US Dept. o
Australia
US Dept. oAustria
US Dept. oAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
US Dept. oBaden*
Bahamas, The
US Dept. oBahrain
US Dept. oBangladesh
US Dept. oBarbados
US Dept. oBavaria*
US Dept. oBelarus
US Dept. oBelgium
US Dept. oBelize
US Dept. oBenin (Dahomey)
US Dept. oBolivia
US Dept. oBosnia and Herzegovina
US Dept. oBotswana
US Dept. oBrazil
US Dept. oBrunei
US Dept. oBrunswick and Lüneburg*
US Dept. oBulgaria
US Dept. oBurkina Faso (Upper Volta)
US Dept. oBurma
US Dept. oBurundi
US Dept. oCabo Verde
US Dept. oCambodia
US Dept. oCameroon
US Dept. oCanada
US Dept. oCayman Islands, The
US Dept. oCentral African Republic
US Dept. oCentral American Federation*
US Dept. oChad
US Dept. oChile
US Dept. oChina
China
US Dept. oColombia
US Dept. oComoros
US Dept. oCongo Free State, The*
US Dept. oCosta Rica
US Dept. oCote d’Ivoire
US Dept. oCroatia
US Dept. oCuba
US Dept. oCyprus
US Dept. oCzechia
US Dept. oCzechoslovakia*
US Dept. oDemocratic Republic of the Congo
US Dept. oDenmark
US Dept. oDjibouti
US Dept. oDominica
US Dept. oDominican Republic
US Dept. oDuchy of Parma, The*
US Dept. oEast Germany
US Dept. oEcuador
US Dept. oEgypt
US Dept. oEl Salvador
US Dept. oEquatorial Guinea
US Dept. oEritrea
US Dept. oEstonia
US Dept. oEswatini
US Dept. oEthiopia
US Dept. oFederal Government of Germany *
US Dept. oFiji
US Dept. oFinland
Earlier this month, the US Department of Education (ED) made a call to action and broadened the definition of the digital divide by releasing its first National Educational Technology Plan (NETP) since 2016.
The simplest definition of the digital divide is that there are haves and have-nots when it comes to technology. That can be anything from lacking access to high-speed internet in a rural county to not being able to afford to pay for Wi-Fi or buy devices.
As tech literacy becomes a mandatory part of joining the workforce, it largely falls to schools to address the digital divide — and to help close it.
Read the full 2024 NETP
One-to-one student computing gained traction in 2015, with 45% of public schools committing to assigning school-budget-friendly Chromebooks or laptops to students in elementary through high school. That was a big step toward potentially closing the gap.
But when the COVID-19 lockdowns made virtual schooling necessary, a huge gash of inequity was exposed. Some kids had school-issued Chromebooks and no access to wifi. Others had no device at home, despite the one-to-one initiative.
Why aren’t schools more effectively closing the digital divide? In the 2024 National Education Action Plan, the ED pinpoints issues and proposes solutions within an expanded digital equity framework.
It’s a detailed 113-page document that anyone interested in education, technology and the digital divide should read in full. Here, we break down some of the main takeaways.
The 2016 NETP had a focus on the digital divide and ways to address it. The 2024 edition goes even deeper by dividing the divide into three distinct types that need to be addressed individually:
Closing these divides requires funding, resources and training. That’s a lot to implement.
But, if legislation like the recently introduced federal AI Literacy Act gets passed, schools may see more funding for digital literacy.
Some things the NETP asks state lawmakers to do now include:
The NETP includes dozens of examples of effective edtech implementation from all over the country, proving that, while challenging, it can be done. Here’s an excerpt from an appendix that details how Virginia collected data about students’ broadband access at home across the state:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Virginia needed a complete picture of student home access to devices and broadband. The state couldn’t apply resources to address the problem without an accurate understanding of student access. In 2022, Virginia passed legislation requiring every school district to submit an annual report to the Virginia Department of Education and the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development listing the 911 address of all students who do not have home broadband access, defined by speeds at or above 100 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 20 Mbps upload.

Data collection processes can be challenging to establish, and school districts had to devise methods of collecting accurate information from families. In addition, the data includes PII such as student addresses and must be secured. Data collection is more efficient now that systems have been established to gather and protect it. Student information systems must include standardized fields to store the data without requiring districts to make costly custom requests.

By systematically collecting device and access metrics across Virginia, the state has a comprehensive data set for broadband planning. At the local level, districts can understand better how to serve their students and families.
Subscribe for free today and stay up to date with news and tips you need to grow your career and connect with our vibrant tech community.

bestwebsitesworld.blogspot.com

Search This Blog

Donate

US Dept. of Education is redefining the digit

Labels

Popular posts from this blog

Donate

The Role of Technology in Shaping the Future

Amazon launches dedicated online Telugu book store - The Indian Express